dorchadas: (Maedhros A King Is He (No Text))
dorchadas ([personal profile] dorchadas) wrote2025-06-05 09:34 pm

Let me just go outside and-

Canadian wildfires once again:

2025-06-05 - Weather problems


If you can't read Japanese, that's 154 on the AQI scale, which is moderate pollution (中程度の汚染), which is not good. I haven't been outside since Wednesday and don't plan to go out unless I have, though Laila is getting pretty annoyed about not being able to go outside.

It's supposed to last for the next couple days. Hopefully that's all--two years ago we lost most of the summer to Canadian wildfires. Hopefully our neighbors to the north can get the fires contained soon and not too much damage is done.
lb_lee: Rogan drawing/writing in a spiral. (art)
lb_lee ([personal profile] lb_lee) wrote2025-06-05 08:16 am

We are Tabling at Anti-Robot Club in Cambridge!

Details here: https://www.anti-robotclub.com/event-details/the-marketplace-cambridge-ma-2


Time: Sunday, June 8, 12-5 pm

Location:
The Foundry
101 Rogers st.
Cambridge, MA

We will have a bunch of short-run prose collections, including Perspichor Freelance Explorer (an asexual monster romance), Disabled Cyborgs, and more! Cone say hi!
dorchadas: (Azumanga Daioh Chiyo-chan big eyes)
dorchadas ([personal profile] dorchadas) wrote2025-05-30 12:24 pm

That was WILD. They can get away with this?

So on Tuesday, I went with [instagram.com profile] sashagee to get Laila registered for preschool, while Laila was still out at the grandparents. When we got there, there were a bunch of people in line ahead of us, and while waiting in line I realized that we didn't have a printout copy of our proof of income, so I downloaded a PDF on my phone and got ready to argue about access to a printer or an email address to mail it to. Then it turned out when we got to the front it didn't matter--the woman doing the registering couldn't seem to find Laila in the system, and when she started talking with [instagram.com profile] sashagee it seemed there was a miscommunication somewhere. See, [instagram.com profile] sashagee had registered Laila for half-day preschool, and the system--knowing Laila was four years old since this was after putting in all of her information--had let her. At the school, we were told that half-day preschool was only for three-year-olds and that she would have to talk to the Office of Early Childhood Education to get things sorted out.

[instagram.com profile] sashagee was understandably upset by this, and went home and made some calls. A call to the school wasn't returned (I don't think we ever got that email back that we were supposed to get...) but a call to the family hotline told her that since we had applied to half-day preschool, and had received an acceptance notice for half-day preschool, they had to take her. She just might be in a class with three-year-olds.

Armed with this knowledge, [instagram.com profile] sashagee sent off an email explaining things to the contact she had and then she (and Laila since she was back) went back to the school on Thursday to re-register while I was at work. She left fifteen minutes before registration opened (the school is within a few minutes' walk) and was gone until fifteen minutes after registration closed, and when she came back she told me a wild tale. There had been one person ahead of her and the same person doing the registration, and when the person ahead of her was finished, the woman saw [instagram.com profile] sashagee, said hello, and went back into her office and just...didn't come back. After thirty minutes the security guard went back to see what was going on and someone else came out and finished Laila's registration no problem, other than reiterating that she'd probably be in a class with three-year-olds.

Unbelievable. Just wild unprofessionalism. And I bet we'll have to deal with this woman again too, since this is our neighborhood school. Emoji rain Hopefully Laila's actual preschool experience goes better than her registration does!
lb_lee: a black and white animated gif of a pro wrestler flailing his arms above the words STILL THE BEST (VICTORY)
lb_lee ([personal profile] lb_lee) wrote2025-06-03 12:21 pm

A new home for Dude and Skeeter (and us)!

Thanks to everyone who took part in the cat fostering! The day before I moved, I got to run by and finally meet Dude and Skeeter, the fluffballs who have occupied so much of my mental real estate.

dreadlordmrson: The Eye of Dread. (Default)
Mr. Son ([personal profile] dreadlordmrson) wrote2025-06-02 05:13 pm

Centaurs and werewolves

This centaur post by Chrysopoeia made me think of an old idea I had for unusual werewolves in a world I haven't worked with in a long time.

The idea was that werewolves and wolves were just... the same thing.

All wolves had both a human and a wolf form. How easy it was to change forms and which form they were more comfortable in, was a result of how they lived.

A wolf who acted more human and civilized looked more human and civilized, and had an easier time staying in human form, and thinking like a human. They were usually shorter and hairier than humans, but within typical tolerances so you couldn't really visually tell the difference between a civilized wolf and say, me (5'2" and a bit shaggy).
A more bestial werewolf on the other hand, who lived as an animal, would be uncomfortable trying to act or look like a human, and would only take human form if they needed to. A naked hairy man showing up at your camp begging for food might be a hermit, but they're more likely a hungry wolf who doesn't want to make trouble.

Every wolf's preferred lifestyle and form would come from a mix of that wolf's preferences, choices, and upbringing. Wolves would typically be most used to the form that made their lives easier and helped them thrive. Though a wolf could always change to the other lifestyle if they wanted to and tried hard.

Writing all this up, I could see how it could fit some sort of racial/racism allegory into it? Or queerness, esp. bisexuality? Or transness? But I was coming at it from the more fantastical angle. That these are literally a shape-shifting wolf-person living in this fantasy world. They hadn't even been meant to be a major part of the story but they're clearly something you could write an entire story around.

I haven't worked on that world in a long time now, but some time it would be nice to go back, or to reuse these wolves elsewhere.
chalcedony_starlings: Two scribbled waveforms, one off-black and one off-white, overlapping, on a flat darkish purpleish background. (scribble twins)
Chalcedony Starlings ([personal profile] chalcedony_starlings) wrote2025-06-02 01:22 pm
lb_lee: A happy little brain with a bandage on it, enclosed within a circle with the words LB Lee. (Default)
lb_lee ([personal profile] lb_lee) wrote2025-05-30 11:16 am
Entry tags:

Offline until at least June 1

Computer getting packed. If you need to get in contact with us quickly, use phone. We have a broken smartphone that SOMETIMES can access DW or email, but don't count on it.

See y'all at the new place!
renegadefolkhero: (Default)
The Honorable Renaldo E. Gade III D.O. CPA Esq. ([personal profile] renegadefolkhero) wrote2025-05-30 06:52 am

Plagiarism or Simply Derivative?

I'm fascinated by a story I only recently heard about... An extremely popular romantasy book (Crave by Tracy Wolff) is facing accusations of plagiarism, and the connections between the unpublished manuscript and the published book raise a lot of questions. Not just about sharing tropes and genre language, but about osmosis, and how much we absorb from other people's work and unconsciously project into our art.

Did a Best-Selling Romantasy Novelist Steal Another Writer's Story? (at archive.is)

Romantasy’s reliance on tropes poses a challenge for questions of copyright. Traditionally, the law protects the original expression of ideas, not the ideas themselves. A doctrine named for the French phrase scènes à faire, or “scenes that must be done,” holds that the standard elements of a genre (such as a showdown between the hero and the villain) are not legally protectable, although their selection and arrangement might be. The wild proliferation of intensely derivative romantasies has complicated this picture. The worlds of romance and fantasy have been so thoroughly balkanized, the production of content so accelerated, that what one might assume to be tropes—falling in love with a werewolf or vampire, say—are actually subgenres. Tropes operate at an even more granular level (bounty-hunter werewolves, space vampires). And the more specific the trope, the harder it is to argue that such a thing as an original detail exists.

The article also delves into the role of book packagers in several high-profile Romantasy bestsellers. All traditionally published books are collaborative on some level, but when book packaging companies get involved the lines between author, editor, publisher, and marketing can get extremely blurred. Crave's final draft was created by multiple collaborators during several whirlwind weeks right before the book went to press, and the rough was written in 2 months. In deposition, the author wasn't entirely sure if she wrote all the passages in question.


I don't read or write romantasy, but from what I gather, the readership craves "more of that" to such an exacting standard an outsider might not understand why This Romantasy book went gangbusters, and That One did not. Writers who can read and understand the market (which is a specific skillset not every writer has, in Clifton it's referred to as the Drafter archetype) have been able to leverage that understanding to make lot of money in this genre, but eventually Romantasy will hit a saturation point and it will be harder to sell books.

I casually know a couple of full-time indie romantasy authors (middle and top earners) who LOVE the genre. They genuinely love reading and writing it, they are incredibly intelligent and hard-working writers who have absolutely earned every bit of their success, and there is clearly a lot of heart in their books and process. But this genre seems ideal for "chefs in the kitchen" tinkering to find that winning recipe, and the book packaging company's ability to leverage this genre multiple times shows it can be done. Reading about the marketing savvy of the book packager Entangled Publishing (which also published Fourth Wing) gave me flashbacks to another story of a made-for-market book going gangbusters: 50 Shades of Gray. E. L. James is a little different, in that part of her strategy was filing off the serial numbers (a strategy many other fanfiction writers would later employ to launch their own romances as part of the more recent fanfic-to-tradpub pipeline), but at it's core 50 Shades incredible success is a marketing success story.


Packaging companies are not new to plagiarism claims. This story reminded me of an older one... In 2006, Kaavya Viswanathan was accused of plagiarizing several authors when she wrote How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life. The book packager Alloy Entertainment was involved in that process. Viswanathan was introduced to an agent who felt her current manuscript was too dark, and suggested she write something lighter that would sell better, and the agency referred her to the book packaging service.

I won't get into how some agents take kickbacks to steer writers towards dubious companies and programs, and I'm not making the assertion that Alloy Entertainment is or was dubious, but if an agent referred me to a book packager I would consider that a creative disconnect and politely cut my losses. In Viswanathan's case, Alloy Entertainment inked a 2-book deal with Little, Brown stipulating Viswanathan would produce the books, with the author and Alloy Entertainment splitting the advance and copyright. The scandal blew up, and the book crashed and burned big time and was pulled. As with Crave, the work of the author and the packaging company blended in such a way there was some question as to who actually plagiarized what.


There's been a lot of talk about why, if you'll forgive me for phrasing it this way, Romantasy readers are the way they are (It's the pandemic! It's being obsessed with Twilight/Harry Potter/Etc during one's formative years! It's the economy! It's the crushing state of the world!). Reading the GR reviews for the more popular romantasy books is always mind-boggling to me, because there's always a standard ratio of incoherent squeeing to "this was a boring retread" or "this is exactly like x, y, and z," or "omg this book literally copied such-and-such" and as an outsider I'm never really sure what tipped the scale one way or another.

Wanting More of That is not new. Mystery series have always leaned heavily on providing same protagonist, slightly different flavor of murder, for example. Romance and Fantasy are two readerships that I think historically have been very forgiving of retreading and rehashing favorite scenarios, particularly in stories with wish-fulfillment protagonists. At least right now, it seems a lot of what's selling in fiction across the board is escapism that's fast to process. People just want to kick back and read a fun story about a snarky woman who butts-heads-with-but-ultimately-marries a slightly-bad-but-mostly-just-hot vampire/werewolf/dragon while making an impact on the world around her. It's not for me, but I get it.

When will romantasy fans collectively decide they've had their fill? And when that happens... where will they go next? It will be interesting to see.

dorchadas: (Legend of Zelda Zelda Dark Princess)
dorchadas ([personal profile] dorchadas) wrote2025-05-29 10:38 am

I can hardly believe this is real

Bandai-Namco: "What are your qualifications?"
Trailer Person: "I spent 2001-2010 making a ton of AMVs."
Bandai-Namco: "Say no more."


Watch in 240p for the best experience.

From mid 00s Animemusicvideos.org removing all Evanescence AMVs due to a Cease & Desist order to this. I wonder if someone carried a grudge all this time?
lb_lee: Rogan drawing/writing in a spiral. (art)
lb_lee ([personal profile] lb_lee) wrote2025-05-28 05:44 pm
Entry tags:

2025 June Fan Poll

Hey everybody, it's that time again: time to vote for which stuff gets the LiberaPay/Patreon money this month!

As always, anyone can vote (please do!), but LiberaPay and Patreon patrons get double weight for their votes.  (Due to Patreon's porn purges, I really encourage you to use LiberaPay, if you get a choice.) If you want to see the blurbs for any of these works, those are here!  (You can also leave your requests there; requesting a story or essay is always free!) If you don't have a DW and so can't do the poll, that's okay; just leave your vote in the comments below; anon comments are turned on.

Which works gets the money, and thus posted this month?  YOU CHOOSE, readers!
Poll #33175 2025 June Fan Poll
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 23


Did you toss LiberaPay/Patreon money my way last month?

View Answers

Yes (my votes count double)
6 (100.0%)

What writing gets posted this month?

View Answers

Infinity Smashed: Born Lucky
7 (31.8%)

Reverend Alpert: the Traveling Exorcist
3 (13.6%)

Henchwench for Hire (F/F supervillainy)
3 (13.6%)

Rutless (trans omegaverse porno)
4 (18.2%)

Flights of Reality (the Cursed City)
1 (4.5%)

Anatomy of a Dance
7 (31.8%)

The Boy Whose Heart Is Home
3 (13.6%)

The Battleaxe and the Blood-Eater
1 (4.5%)

Crisis Planning: Legal/Medical Stuff
11 (50.0%)

What art/comic/zine gets posted this month?

View Answers

Cult Comix
1 (5.0%)

Death Watch
6 (30.0%)

How it Was, How It Is
7 (35.0%)

2012 hospital sketchbook
0 (0.0%)

2013 Homeless Year sketchbook
2 (10.0%)

2014 AllFam sketchbook
2 (10.0%)

Protection
5 (25.0%)

Kissing
12 (60.0%)

lb_lee: Mori making a ridiculous face. (mori)
lb_lee ([personal profile] lb_lee) wrote2025-05-28 03:08 pm

Knocking from the Inside: Breaking Free from Mental Imperialism, by Jimmy Dunson

Mori: I textually transcribed this zine I raved about earlier! It's a mad pride manifesto with influences from Thich Nhat Hanh, the Icarus Project, Inner Family Systems, and anarchist concepts like mutual aid and collective liberation. Its beautiful imperfection means a lot to my hothead self, so here it is!

This zine is anti-authority and anti-medical. You may not want to read it, especially if you're in a place mentally where your brain is causing you a lot of havoc and doesn't seem at all your friend. Paris Williams's Rethinking Madness: Towards a Paradigm Shift In Our Understanding and Treatment of Psychosis covers some similar territory with more research, page count, and moderation.

Knocking from the Inside: Breaking Free from Mental Imperialism
by Jimmy Dunson

You have lost your mind? So? There are worse things to lose. You have found the heart and soul of the universe. You simply stopped being the false god to the universe within you, you stopped being the dictator to your differing parts. )
lb_lee: Rogan drawing/writing in a spiral. (art)
lb_lee ([personal profile] lb_lee) wrote2025-05-25 10:49 pm
Entry tags:

Howard Schatz's "At the Fights" handwraps drawing refs

Rogan: I love drawing handwraps, they're so aesthetically appealing, but it's also tricky to find good reference for them! Fortunately, the largest, HEAVIEST book I own is Howard Schatz's At the Fights, an ENORMOUS photobook of boxers. I regret the Brobdignagian size of the thing (and the WEIGHT, oof, that book must weight close to ten pounds) but I had fun pulling it out for reference sketches on this month's Patreon postcards...

pic behind cut! )
renegadefolkhero: (Default)
The Honorable Renaldo E. Gade III D.O. CPA Esq. ([personal profile] renegadefolkhero) wrote2025-05-24 07:15 am

Kobo Screech Post

After a year saying, "I need to pivot to SFF, and to hell with sales," I'm finally there, and it feels nice. I've wrapped up the remaining mostly-done romance books that needed to be pushed out the door and I'm forbidden from publishing anything this summer. I have ZERO release dates for the rest of 2025. Amazing.

Kobo Screeching

I had a wonderful surprise this week.

Read more... )